Island biodiversity disproportionately exposed to global change

Key messages:

  • By 2050, most island ecosystems will be threatened by global change: 65% primarily by climate change, 22% by land-use change and 13% by biological invasions.
  • With its various island territories, France is among the 31 countries where endemic biodiversity is particularly exposed to global change.
  • Scientists are calling for these ecosystems to be incorporated into global biodiversity conservation strategies and for their protection to be strengthened.

 

Although they account for just 7% of the Earth’s land surface, island ecosystems harbour almost 20% of the world’s biodiversity. From sea-level rise to biological invasions, islands are facing multiple pressures associated with ongoing global change, and yet they are still overlooked in global biodiversity conservation strategies².

 

Scientists from the Écologie, Société et Évolution (ESE) laboratory (AgroParisTech-Paris/CNRS/Université Paris Saclay) and the Centre for the Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity (CESAB)³ have completed the first global assessment of the exposure of islands larger than one square kilometre to global change. Their findings are alarming: by 2050, climate change will be the dominant threat for 65% of island ecosystems; land-use change will be the primary threat for 22%, particularly in the Pacific (Micronesia and Fiji), the Baltic Sea, the Bay of Bengal and Southeast Asia; while biological invasions will be the main threat for 13%, posing a heightened risk to temperate islands such as those in Northern Europe.

 

The team also identified the countries and regions most disproportionately exposed to these risks, based on the number of islands located there. France has an unusually high number of “exposure hotspots” — islands highly exposed to all three threats — including in French Polynesia and certain islands in mainland France. This places it among the 25% of countries most exposed. The Seychelles, Bangladesh, China, Fiji, Micronesia, Denmark, Sweden, India and Japan are also affected.

 

 

Cumulative exposure of islands to global change. Islands worldwide are exposed to varying degrees to the three threats analysed: biological invasions, climate change and land-use change, shown by the colour gradient. Islands in Northern Europe, the East China Sea and the Pacific are among those highly exposed to all three threats and constitute “exposure hotspots”. © Clara Marino

 

 

In response to these findings, the authors call for stronger protection of islands in the 31 countries identified as having a disproportionately high number of exposure hotspots, through locally tailored strategies. Ecosystem restoration and the development of protected areas are among the solutions that can both limit the impacts of climate change and reduce opportunities for the establishment of invasive alien species. The exposure maps produced by this research are valuable tools for prioritising action. The research team also stresses the importance of developing complementary datasets to the ones used in this study, so that other currently underrepresented threats can be included, such as plastic, pesticide and light pollution, as well as the overexploitation of resources.

 

The findings were obtained by combining several existing datasets with original modelling at the scale of the world’s islands. Additional models were developed to produce projections for 2050. Maps showing the exposure levels of the 16,578 islands analysed make it easy to identify the island territories facing the greatest threats.

 

 

 

Read the Media article on the same topic

 

 

________________

 

Notes

1- These findings are from the FRB-CESAB Rivage project.

2- For example, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (2022)

3- Scientists from the EDYSAN (Ecologie et dynamique des systèmes anthropisés) laboratory (Université Picardie Jules Verne) and the Institute of Analytical Sciences and Physico-Chemistry for Environment and Materials (IPREM) (CNRS/Université Pau et Pays de l’Adour)

Beyond economic factors: The role of social behaviour in the establishment of protected areas

Collective behaviour as an explanatory factor

The researchers analysed data from 71 countries by combining international surveys on human behaviour with geographic data on protected areas.

Four behavioural dimensions from the Global Preferences Survey were examined: trust in others, altruism, patience, and willingness to take risks.

Only one of these traits showed a significant association: countries where individuals reported higher levels of trust in others tended, on average, to have a lower proportion of protected areas.

 

Figure. Negative relationship between trust in others and the percentage of protected areas. Each dot is a country.

 

One hypothesis put forward by the authors is that, in societies where interpersonal trust is high, the preservation of natural resources may rely more heavily on informal forms of cooperation, reducing the need for regulatory mechanisms such as protected areas. Conversely, in societies where distrust is more prevalent, biodiversity conservation may more often depend on formal institutional mechanisms.

However, the study focuses on the surface area of protected areas designated according to the criteria of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), rather than on their actual conservation effectiveness. As such, it does not determine whether these areas genuinely achieve their biodiversity conservation objectives—a key issue in scientific debates, particularly given the existence of so-called paper parks (protected areas whose protection remains largely theoretical).

 

 

A new dimension to consider in conservation policies

These findings suggest that collective behaviour is one of many factors that may influence national conservation strategies. It complements other factors already identified—such as history, institutions, political priorities, and economic resources—that help explain differences in the proportion of protected areas across countries.

These results should not be interpreted as an argument for reducing the extent of protected areas in societies where trust is high. Rather, they reveal an association at the international level without establishing a causal relationship, and suggest that the behavioural characteristics of populations represent an additional dimension for understanding differences between countries.

 

The primary objective is to improve our understanding of how social factors may influence conservation choices. The study therefore encourages the development of conservation approaches that are better adapted to local social and cultural contexts, rather than assuming that a single model can be applied with equal effectiveness across all countries.

 

 

 

Further reading – Learn more about the Spatman project

Banque de France, FRB and European research partnerships strengthen multilateral cooperation to advance nature-positive finance

At a time when biodiversity loss increasingly affects economic resilience and financial stability, the organisations underline a shared conviction: nature-related risks cannot be effectively addressed through isolated action. They require stronger cooperation across disciplines, institutions and sectors, supported by robust scientific knowledge and international dialogue. Through this joint statement, the participating organisations affirm their willingness to strengthen the science-finance interface and contribute to a more coherent and evidence-based approach to nature-related risks.

 

In particular, they highlight the importance of:

  • strengthening dialogue between science, finance and public institutions to improve mutual understanding of nature-related dependencies, impacts and risks;

  • supporting the mobilisation of scientific knowledge and expertise to better inform financial analysis, methodologies and decision-making;

  • encouraging stronger cooperation across sectors and governance levels to help align financial flows and economic systems with biodiversity objectives;

  • contributing to enabling conditions for more resilient and nature-positive financial systems, including stronger analytical capacities, evolving tools and improved knowledge-sharing.

 

By bringing together financial institutions, research actors and European biodiversity partnerships, this initiative seeks to reinforce dialogue, bridge expertise, and support practical pathways for mainstreaming biodiversity considerations into economic and financial decision-making, in line with the objectives of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. At a time when multilateral cooperation is increasingly challenged globally, this shared statement reflects the need for a multilateral and cross-sector response to nature-related risks. Building on the momentum of the 10 June workshop, Banque de France, FRB, Biodiversa+, the BiodivRestore Knowledge Hub and CO-OP4CBD and RESPIN projects reaffirm a shared ambition: to strengthen the multilateral cooperation between science and finance and help ensure that scientific evidence more effectively informs financial action.

 

 

Read the Joint Statement

retour en haut de la page
fermer